What’s Up With Gold and Silver and Should You Buy Any Junk Silver?

By admin

f you pay any attention to the commodities or precious metals market, you know that gold, silver, and other precious metals go up and down in “value” on a daily basis. Much like the stock market, these metals seem to be constantly being raised or lowered depending upon what is happening throughout the world. Then there is what is known as “junk silver.”

silver coinage

It’s not really junk you know…

I have a desktop app that I always have open that provides me with a live view of activity with respect to gold, silver, palladium, and other metals. It’s a bit hilarious to watch, I must admit.Several months ago, the spot price of gold was at $1368/ounce. I just happened to be in the market for what is referred to as “junk silver,” a term that refers to coinage. I purchased some silver coins as well as gold coins and not because I see them as an investment necessarily, but as a way to barter for items I may need after the collapse; a collapse that is most certainly coming.

At any rate, since that time, gold and silver prices continue to fluctuate. Gold went to a high of just over $1400/ounce, but it now sits at $1272/ounce as I write this (11:58am). Silver moves as well, but certainly not nearly as much, with a penny or two here or there. When I began to purchase junk silver, it was $18/ounce. Now it’s just over $21/ounce.

The big question is why do these metals fluctuate? In my opinion – and bear in mind, it is just my opinion – there are several things happening that cause the fluctuation in the precious metals market, just as they do in the stock market.

Several years ago, the UK literally dumped tons and tons of gold onto the precious metals market. I believe this was done to artificially lower the price of gold so that people would panic and start selling their gold. It really didn’t work. The worst part is that much of the gold dumped onto the market was not even the UK’s own gold, but gold from other countries.

In the past month or so, several countries began dumping some of their gold and I believe it was for the same purposes that the UK dumped gold when they did. Now however, China seems poised to dump the dollar because they know the dollar is essentially worthless and got that way when Republican President Nixon entered into a deal with the Saudis to back the US dollar with oil instead of gold.

There are too many articles on the ‘Net that warn people against having faith in the dollar or our economic system. They say invest heavily in gold. I’m not so sure about that, but that’s just me.

As far as investment goes, I think a good, practical investment is found in purchasing junk silver (coinage) because if there is a crash (and I don’t see how one can be avoided), the dollar will be worth less than it was during the Great Depression. What will people use to buy things? They will have to go to a bartering system and junk silver will undoubtedly be part of that system.

If you look at junk silver from this perspective, then it really doesn’t matter what the precious metals market says today or tomorrow. If a crash happens, it is very clear that the value of junk silver will skyrocket. As one reputable dealer told me, it may well be that one silver dime will buy one loaf of bread. Silver is worth roughly $21/ounce now. After the coming crash, it will be worth much, much more. Can you imagine paying $20 for a loaf of bread NOW? I can’t, yet this is what may occur as a result of the coming crash: hyperinflation after the complete failure of the US dollar.

In the past months, we have seen several system failures. Recently, we saw the giant glitch in the federal government’s EBT (welfare) system that created havoc for several hours as people tried to buy as much as they could because their cards showed no limit. When their cards eventually showed they had no money available and could buy nothing, they simply walked out of stores, leaving their gathered merchandise in shopping carts, which blocked aisles and created problems for store personnel and shoppers.

Currently, America has over 50 million people receiving some form of government supplement. It will not be pretty when the system crashes and it must because it is being artificially propped up now. Try to imagine the havoc that will ensue.

I’m not an economist, but I would certainly recommend buying some junk silver and stocking up a bit on items you might need for the future. If a hurricane was bearing down on your area, would you not do what you could to provide for yourself and your family?

I sat on my porch this morning having my daily devotions and praying, as I do every morning. I thought about all the people who are blind to what is inevitably coming our way. It is incredible to me that people can simply go about life without noticing signs that point to the danger is ahead.

I hope you’re not one of those blind people, but if you are, I’m hoping you’ll wake up before the coming crash. Just as some believe the idea of a crash is absurd, I cannot see how we are going to avoid it really. I guess it all has to do with perspective.

I’ll leave you with this article about false flags. Governments (including the USA) have admitted to carrying out false flags. Why? Because they want to get something done and they want to do it without having to worry about politicians saying “no.”

Read it, take note, and prepare. Click here for the article.
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/10/whats-up-with-gold-and-silver-and-should-you-buy-any-junk-silver/#jbOQ1fKDAfwWw1IO.99

Published in our category: Blog

The “Small” Solution to a Big Tax Problem

By admin

If the government levies taxes on landowners, retailers, corporations, and individuals, it is far from certain that the targeted interest groups will actually pay the tax. Depending on a variety of factors, they may be able to roll over or shift the tax to other people (tenants, consumers, workers, etc.) either partly or entirely. As Alfred Marshall said: “There is scarcely any economic principle which cannot be aptly illustrated by a discussion of the shifting of the effects of some taxes.”

The Swedish Nobel Laureate, economist, sociologist, and politician Karl Gunmar Myrdal also contended that the results of taxes can “diverge greatly” from the intentions. (All government interventions in free markets lead to unintended consequences.) This was already obvious to David Ricardo, who commented: “Almost all taxes on production fall finally on the consumer.”

Nordic countries…are in nature more like country clubs where the members share a common interest and pride themselves on maintaining the club in perfect condition…

Another issue relates to what percentage of total revenues a government should collect from indirect taxes (sales taxes, taxes on tobacco, gambling, alcohol, gasoline, all kinds of transaction taxes, and import duties), which tend to be somewhat regressive, and how much it should raise through direct taxes (income, capital gains, property taxes, etc.). This is an issue that preoccupied John Stuart Mill, whose view was: “The very reason which makes direct taxation disagreeable, makes it preferable…. If all taxes were direct, taxation would be much more perceived than at present; and there would be a security which now there is not, for economy in the public expenditure”.

This is an excellent point. If every American had only to pay income taxes and the government collected no revenues from indirect taxes, which are less visible to people, there would likely be a revolution, because Americans would suddenly realise how much tax they were paying (my guess is around 25% of their income) for a government that is incapable of achieving any meaningful military successes abroad, that is failing to successfully implement a healthcare website for which it has already paid US$600 million, and which cannot provide a school system to which people are happy to entrust their children’s education.

However, by far the largest issue I have with PIMCO’s Bill Gross’s proposal to increase capital gains taxes (which I discussed in my essay “The World’s Only Popular Tax”) is that I oppose higher taxes under any circumstances because higher taxes allow the government to expand and, in the process of expanding, to retard economic growth and curtail individual freedom. Bob Hoye recently sent out a missive highlighting the difference between the expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet during the Second World War and since 2009.

US Treasury Securities Held By the Federal Reserve (1919-2012)

According to Hoye, extraordinary funding measures between 1940 and 1944 were justifiable because “World War II was prosecuted in the defense of freedom”, whereas the recent increase “has been to fund the expansion of the state for the state itself” and “ironically, this has been part of a relentless attempt to extinguish freedom”.

But aside from this, we are all aware of how dysfunctional and wasteful the US government is. In some European countries, the situation is not much better or is even worse. Does anyone really want to give the government more money with which to wage additional senseless and extremely costly wars, and to distribute even more food stamps, and to allow even more people to receive disability benefits?

Concerning taxes, I side with Milton Friedman, who argued: “I am [in] favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse, for any reason, whenever it’s possible”. Along the same lines, I am also in favour of cutting government expenditures under any circumstances and for any excuse, for any reason, whenever it’s possible. In this respect, it is interesting to note that Switzerland, which has relatively low taxes, enjoys a high level of prosperity and low unemployment, and has a balanced household budget.

Public Finance Indicators, 2012

As a percentage of all households, Switzerland also has a far higher number of millionaires than the US . I concede that it is natural for small low-tax countries or city-states with a high degree of freedom and good infrastructure to attract a large number of wealthy people.

Millionaires as a Percentage of Households in 2011

Lastly, income inequality as measured by the so-called “Gini coefficient” is relatively low in Switzerland. I am not singling out Switzerland because I am Swiss, but because I wish to show that we may have to look not just at tax rates but also at other factors in order to explain high income and wealth inequality.

Sign Up for the Daily Reckoning HERE

We will NOT share your email address

I do concede, however, that income inequality is low in the high-tax regimes of the European Nordic countries and high in the low-tax regimes of Hong Kong and Singapore.

I mentioned that I would always be in favour of lower taxes and lower government spending. However, I have sympathy with the economic and social system in Nordic countries, where people contribute to the government a large portion of their income but also get in return first- class schools, healthcare facilities, and other social benefits. Friedrich Hayek explained in The Road to Serfdom that the world would be a better place if it consisted of smaller nations. My friend, the economist Jim Walker , recently drew my attention to Hayek’s comment in his book:

We shall not rebuild civilisation on a large scale. It is no accident that on the whole there was more beauty and decency to be found in the life of small peoples, and that among the large ones there was more happiness and content in proportion as they had avoided the deadly blight of centralisation. Least of all shall we preserve democracy or foster its growth if all the power and most of the important decisions rest with an organisation far too big for the common man to survey or comprehend.

Nowhere has democracy ever worked well without a great measure of local self-government, providing a school of political training for the people at large as much as for their future leaders. It is only where responsibility can be learnt and practised in affairs with which most people are familiar, where it is the awareness of one’s neighbour rather than some theoretical knowledge of the needs of other people which guides action, that the ordinary man can take a real part in public affairs because they concern the world he knows.

Where the scope of the political measures becomes so large that the necessary knowledge is almost exclusively possessed by the bureaucracy, the creative impulses of the private person must flag. I believe that here the experience of the small countries like Holland and Switzerland contains much from which even the most fortunate larger countries like Great Britain can learn. We shall all be the gainers if we can create a world fit for small states to live in.

Heinz Blasnik, a leading expert on Austrian Economics, supplied another Hayek thought from the same book, which relates to a change in moral values that is brought about by the advance of collectivism. According to Hayek,

There is one aspect of the change in moral values brought about by the advance of collectivism which at the present time provides special food for thought. It is that the virtues which are held less and less in esteem and which consequently become rarer are precisely those on which the British people justly prided themselves and in which they were generally agreed to excel. The virtues possessed by Anglo-Saxons in a higher degree than most other people, excepting only a few of the smaller nations, like the Swiss and the Dutch, were independence and self-reliance, individual initiative and local responsibility, the successful reliance on voluntary activity, noninterference with one’s neighbor and tolerance of the different and queer, respect for custom and tradition, and a healthy suspicion of power and authority.

The point is that what may work in terms of state involvement in small societies such as the Nordic countries, which are in nature more like country clubs where the members share a common interest and pride themselves on maintaining the club in perfect condition, is unlikely to work in population-rich countries where different interest groups are eager to benefit at the expense of someone else. I should add that these “Country Club Nordic Societies” are likely to change in the years ahead as immigrants from Eastern Europe and Africa settle there in order to take advantage of the generous social benefits and high educational standards.

The high wealth and income inequality in Hong Kong and Singapore is undesirable but needs to be understood in the following context. Because of their low taxes and high degree of freedom, both cities have attracted wealthy people from all over the world, which explains the high number of millionaires in these cities.

Furthermore, the expansionary US monetary policies created colossal asset bubbles in these two cities’ high-end real estate markets (this applies particularly to Hong Kong, whose currency is pegged to the US dollar) and is much in line with record high art, precision watch, wine, and diamond prices for the highest-quality pieces.

But the difference between the wealth and income inequality in Singapore and Hong Kong, and that in the US, is that most people in these two cities (the so-called 90%) enjoy better living conditions than 15 years ago and their net worth has appreciated, whereas in the US this is not the case.


Marc Faber
for The Daily Reckoning

Published in our category: Blog

The One Metal Worth Buying in 2014

By admin

The list of finalists in the running for “worst performing asset of the year” is topped by gold, silver and the companies that mine them.

No, 2013 was not kind to precious metals. Gold’s down more than 26%. Miners are off by more than 52%. It’s a bloodbath, to say the least…

However, not all precious metals have both feet in the gutter. In fact, there’s one metal we’ve been tracking that looks like it is setting up for a strong 2014.

I’m talking about palladium. It’s useful (palladium is a key component in catalytic converters for the auto industry). And even more importantly, this forgotten precious metal has bucked the downtrend that’s punished gold and silver for the past eight months.

Physical Palladium Shares 2010-Present

Palladium’s spot price is up nearly 6% so far this year. That’s still underperforming the S&P by a couple of miles. But palladium is holding its own as gold pushes toward its lows. And the Physical Palladium Shares ETF (NYSE:PALL) is setting up for a potential breakout year. A pop above $75 could send this name much higher this winter.

Sign Up for the Daily Reckoning HERE

We will NOT share your email address

Of course, the demand picture is playing a role in the metal’s recent strength.

“Further development in the world economy and increasing global liquidity could boost demand for industrial metals copper, lead, platinum and palladium,” explains the Rude’s own Noah Sugarman. “According to ETF Strategy, significant 2014 tailwinds could come in the form of a sizable supply deficit and increasing U.S/Chinese demand. These fundamental factors may impact Palladium’s price action in a big way.”


Greg Guenthner
for The Daily Reckoning

P.S. PALL isn’t the only way to grab gains during Palladium’s impending run. My colleague and resource guru, Byron King, is tracking another solid option and I gave readers of my Rude Awakening email edition a unique chance to discover it for themselves. Didn’t get today’s Rude Awakening? Don’t worry. Tomorrow’s issue is just around the corner. And I assure you that it will include another opportunity just like this one. No less than 3 such opportunities in fact. So don’t wait.

Published in our category: Blog

« Older Posts